By C. K. Anyanwu, Esq.& Amarachi Lilian Obi (Mrs)

Introduction
The evolution of telecommunications has fundamentally altered the landscape of tortious liability. In the digital age, a single click can disseminate information globally, raising complex questions about where a legal “wrong” actually occurs. The Court of Appeal recently addressed these complexities in the landmark case of Daily Times (Nigeria) Ltd v. Arum (2023) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1914) 559 CA, setting a definitive precedent for online defamation in Nigeria.

a.) Defining the “Online” Space
Legal clarity begins with definitions. The Court defines “online” as being connected to, served by, or available through a system, specifically computer or telecommunications systems like the internet. This definition moves the court away from physical print and into the realm of virtual accessibility.

b.) The Global Implication of Digital Publication

One of the most profound takeaways from the Arum case is the court’s recognition of the “universal accessibility” of the internet. Unlike a physical newspaper with limited circulation, an online publication implies an inherent desire by the publisher to make the material available globally.

c.) The Jurisdictional Test: Where Does the Libel Occur?

The most critical aspect of this judgment concerns jurisdiction. In traditional libel, the cause of action is complete upon publication. However, for online content, the Court of Appeal has established a “Download and Access” rule:

i) A publication available online is deemed to take place at the location where it is downloaded or accessed.

ii) The cause of action is not complete by the mere act of uploading. It must be accessed or downloaded by a third party in a specific jurisdiction.

iii) Mere “virtual existence” or passive internet activity is insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The law requires a nexus between the forum and the injury.

d.) Establishing Venue in State High Courts

To determine which State High Court has the requisite jurisdiction to hear a suit against a defendant who may reside elsewhere, the claimant must prove:

  • The publication was accessed or downloaded in that State by the plaintiff.
  • The plaintiff ordinarily resides or carries on business in that State.
  • The publication was accessed or downloaded in that State by the plaintiff’s witnesses.

In Daily Times v. Arum (supra), the Court found that because the respondent (who lived in Enugu) and his witnesses accessed the defamatory material in Enugu, and because the content targeted events and personalities within Enugu, the High Court of Enugu State possessed the jurisdiction to hear the matter under its Civil Procedure Rules.

Conclusion: (No Hiding Place for Bloggers)

The Court of Appeal has sent a clear message to digital publishers and bloggers: the “borderless” nature of the internet is not a shield against litigation. If a publisher “offloads” defamatory material onto the internet, they must be prepared to justify their claims wherever that material is read, particularly where the victim is targeted.

This decision strengthens the rights of aggrieved parties to seek redress in their own jurisdictions, provided they can prove the material was consumed there.

Follow Our WhatsApp Channel _______________________________________________________________________ LAWBREED NEW WIG SPECIAL OFFER — Give a newly called lawyer a lasting professional gift. Get up to 20% off selected LAWBREED Supreme Court Reports, plus access to My S.C Extra, featuring Supreme Court judgments from 1972 to date. Call/WhatsApp: 08077011741 | 08077011755 | 08077011730 | 08023269613 Email: orders@lawbreed.com | mails@lawbreed.com LAWBREED — Equipping You For Greater Success! _______________________________________________________________________

“Order Justice Omolaye-Ajileye’s Electronic Evidence Books Now” — Essential Guides On Evidence Act, Case Law And Digital Proof

Two leading books on electronic evidence by Hon. Justice Professor Alaba Omolaye-Ajileye, Rtd., PhD, FICMC, are now available for purchase. The publications, Electronic Evidence (Second Edition), With The Evidence Act, 2011 and Compendium Of Cases On Electronic Evidence, Volume II, 2020–2025, provide practical guidance, legal analysis and recent judicial authorities on electronic evidence in Nigeria.Order directly from the author here: https://velvety-cendol-7387ed.netlify.app/ _______________________________________________________________________

[A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials

“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.

Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation

______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com

______________________________________________________________________ Groundbreaking Guide For Lawyers: Adigwe Publishes ‘Artificial Intelligence For Lawyers’ With Free Research eBook As an added bonus, every purchase comes with a FREE ebook titled: “How to use the AI in Legalpedia and Law Pavilion.” Ohio Books Ltd praises the publication, stating: "....this is the only Nigerian book I know of on the topic." How to Order: 📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878 📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com 🌎 Website: www.benadigwe.com Ebook Version: Access it directly online at https://selar.com/prv626 Authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe Esq., ACiarb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director at the Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria.