The recent appointment of Ola Olukoyede as the Executive Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has ignited a legal debate. This contentious decision has led to concerns about whether it complies with the provisions of the EFCC Act 2004, particularly Section 2(3), which outlines the qualifications for the EFCC chairman.
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/2026-IDRI-Masterclass.png")
Presidential spokesperson, Ajuri Ngelale, announced Olukoyede’s appointment and explained that it followed the resignation of the suspended former EFCC chairman, Abdulrasheed Bawa. Muhammad Hassan Hammajoda was also appointed as the Secretary of the EFCC.
However, questions have arisen regarding Olukoyede’s eligibility for the position, specifically concerning Section 2(3) of the EFCC Act. This section stipulates that the chairman must be a serving or retired member of a government security or law enforcement agency not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police or equivalent, with a minimum of 15 years of experience.
Ngelale defended the appointment by citing the powers vested in the president, as established in Section 2(3) of the EFCC (Establishment) Act 2004. He highlighted Olukoyede’s extensive experience, as he had previously served as Chief of Staff to the EFCC executive chairman (2016-2018) and secretary to the commission (2018-2023).
President Tinubu charged the new EFCC leadership with justifying the confidence placed in them, emphasizing the government’s commitment to a renewed fight against corruption. The administration seeks to reform the institutional architecture of the anti-corruption sector as a central pillar of its “Renewed Hope” agenda.
Legal experts and organizations have expressed differing views on Olukoyede’s qualification for the appointment. Country Director of ActionAid Nigeria, Andrew Mamedu, contended that Olukoyede’s appointment violated the EFCC Act. He stressed the importance of the National Assembly upholding the rule of law and called for a review of the appointment.
Notably, Sani Katu, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, expressed his intention to challenge the appointment, citing a breach of the law. He emphasized the need for adherence to established legal requirements. Another Senior Advocate of Nigeria, who spoke anonymously, expressed concerns about the Senate’s ability to address the breach, noting the perceived passivity of the current Senate.
In contrast, Victor Opara, SAN, supported Olukoyede’s appointment, asserting that it was made in compliance with the EFCC Act. He highlighted Olukoyede’s qualifications and his extensive experience within the EFCC.
Although the legal debate over Olukoyede’s appointment continues, the controversy raises questions about the interpretation of the EFCC Act and its application in practice. The decision carries implications for the future direction of the EFCC and its role in combating corruption in Nigeria.
[A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation
______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence
Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via:
0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888
Website: www.alexandernigeria.com
