In a recent interview with Saturday Sun, the Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, opened up about the controversies surrounding his removal by the past government and his subsequent reinstatement by the current administration in the state.
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Idrinstitute.jpg")
The Emir spoke candidly about the history of the Kano Emirate, the reasons behind his unpopularity with the previous government, and the role of traditional institutions in Nigeria.
Addressing the post-reinstatement crises, Emir Sanusi emphasized that the creation of new emirates by the previous government was an act that divided the people of Kano, who had never asked for such a division. He explained that Kano is a largely homogeneous society, and the creation of new emirates was not based on the will of the people but rather on the decision of the then-governor.
The Emir provided a detailed historical context, highlighting that the Kano Emirate had existed for over a thousand years, and the only time a part of Kano was taken out was during the creation of Jigawa State. He criticized the previous government’s actions, likening them to the British partitioning of Africa, and stressed that the creation of new emirates was not done in accordance with the customs and traditions of the people.
Emir Sanusi expressed gratitude to the current government and the State Assembly for restoring the glory of the Kano Emirate and protecting its history and customs. He emphasized that his focus is on the system and not on any individual, stating that he is happy to have played a role in preserving the emirate’s thousand-year history.
When asked about collaborating with other traditional rulers to build the nation, the Emir highlighted the wealth of experience and knowledge among traditional rulers from diverse backgrounds. He sees the traditional institution as a partner to the government, offering advice based on their experience and expertise.
The Emir shared an example from his own experience, where he advised the previous government against borrowing $1.8 billion from China to build a 75-kilometer rail, warning of the potential unsustainable debt burden it would leave for future generations. He emphasized the importance of traditional rulers speaking up for their people and defending their rights, even if it means risking their positions.
Regarding his decision not to challenge his removal in court, Emir Sanusi explained that he did not have a fundamental right to be an Emir and that if it was God’s will for him to leave, he accepted it. He also pointed out the practical challenges of working with a government that had made it clear they did not like him, and the lengthy legal battles that could ensue.
During his time away from the throne, the Emir pursued a PhD at the University of London, focusing on the codification of Islamic Family Law as an instrument of social reform. He shared insights from his research, emphasizing the importance of education and economic empowerment in addressing social issues often attributed to religion or culture.
Looking ahead, Emir Sanusi expressed his commitment to sharing his knowledge and research with the younger generation through academic lectures and seminars. He also highlighted the need for private sector involvement in building the economy and investing in education and skills acquisition programs in Kano.
In conclusion, the Emir reiterated that his focus remains on serving the people, regardless of his title or position. He emphasized the importance of managing the economy effectively and the role of traditional institutions in advising the government and advocating for the well-being of their communities.
Get Your Copy Today! "Drafts and Precedents on Civil Litigation" is available at the following recommended booksellers: 07051822705, lindabasil@yahoo.com
