The President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, on Sunday, fired back at Senator Adams Oshiomhole over criticisms trailing the recent amendment to the Senate Standing Rules, insisting that the changes were aimed at strengthening the institution rather than protecting personal interests.

Akpabio’s response came through his spokesman, Eseme Eyiboh, in a lengthy statement made available to journalists in Abuja.

The former Akwa Ibom governor defended the controversial amendment introducing experience requirements for senators seeking certain presiding and principal offices, arguing that parliamentary leadership demanded competence, institutional memory and procedural knowledge.

The rebuttal comes amid growing controversy over the revised rules and calls for his resignation.

He said, “The controversy surrounding the recent amendment to the Senate Standing Rules has generated more heat than light. Unfortunately, much of the public conversation has been framed around personalities rather than principles, and emotions rather than institutional logic.

“Yet the real issue before the Senate is neither about Senator Godswill Akpabio nor Senator Adams Oshiomhole.”

Akpabio argued that parliamentary leadership required more than political popularity, stressing that the office of Senate President demanded deep familiarity with legislative procedures, constitutional interpretation, committee systems and intergovernmental relations.

“Parliamentary leadership is not merely ceremonial. The office of Senate President is one of the most sensitive and technically demanding constitutional offices in Nigeria.

“It requires not only political popularity but also deep familiarity with parliamentary traditions, legislative procedures, negotiation dynamics, committee systems, constitutional interpretation, and intergovernmental relations. Experience matters,” he argued.

The Senate President explained that legislatures across the world periodically review their rules and traditions to strengthen stability and preserve institutional memory, noting that such reforms should not automatically be interpreted as attempts to exclude new entrants.

Akpabio also rejected suggestions that he should resign because the amended rules would allegedly affect his own eligibility if applied under the new framework.

“It is therefore inaccurate to reduce the issue to the suggestion that the amendment was crafted merely to “shrink competition” or protect personal interests. Institutions do not become stronger by permanently freezing their rules in time.

“Even more problematic is the argument suggesting that because the new qualification threshold did not exist when Senator Godswill Akpabio emerged as Senate President, he should now resign if the new rule is adopted,” the statement added.

According to him, such arguments misunderstand the principle that laws and rules are generally prospective rather than retroactive.

“A law or rule takes effect from the point of enactment forward unless expressly stated otherwise. The amendment cannot logically invalidate a mandate that was legitimately acquired under previously existing rules,” he stated.

The clarification comes barely two weeks after Oshiomhole publicly demanded Akpabio’s resignation over the amended Senate rules.

The Edo North senator had described the amendment as evidence of a “moral crisis” in the Senate, arguing that the process and content of the changes raised serious concerns about fairness, leadership ethics and eligibility within the chamber.

Oshiomhole also claimed that by the standards being proposed, Akpabio no longer met the moral and procedural threshold to continue presiding over the Senate.

But Akpabio insisted that the debate should focus on whether the amendment strengthens the Senate as an enduring democratic institution rather than on the ambitions or grievances of individual politicians.

Follow Our WhatsApp Channel _______________________________________________________________________

“Order Your Copy Now” — Basil Momodu, Esq. Unveils Second Edition Of His Book, "Civil Procedure In Nigeria"

According to the learned author, Basil Momodu Esq. "Law review is a continuum. We will continue to track changes in the law to enrich future editions." Recommended Booksellers: Lagos: 08033855230, Abuja: 08035991379, and others. _______________________________________________________________________

[A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials

“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.

Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation

______________________________________________________________________ “Bridging Theory And Courtroom Practice” — Hagler Sunny Okorie, Nathaniel Ngozi Ikeocha Unveil ‘Functional’ Tort Law Book For Nigerian Legal System The book, titled The Law of Torts in Nigeria: A Functional Approach, authored by Professor Hagler Sunny Okorie Ph.D and Ikeocha, Nathaniel Ngozi Esq, offers law students, practitioners, and academics a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying tort law in Nigerian courts. Interested buyers can place orders via the following contact numbers: 08028636615, 08037667945, 08032253813, or +234 902 196 2209. ______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com