By Prince Azubuike Esq.

It is a certainty that come January 20, 2021, Donald Trump will add a title prefix “former” to him name. The impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump will surface one of the constitution’s most arcane question, to wit: can a President be removed from office if he is no longer occupying the office?

In order to appreciate the legal issues in this situation, it is important to examine the relevant provisions of the Constitution of the United States that addresses the impeachment question.

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States provides as follows:

The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction for Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanours.

Similarly, Article 1, section 3, Clause 7 of the United States constitution, in stating the punishment for impeachment provides that:

Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honour, trust or profit under the United States.

It is imperative to note that it is a cardinal principle of interpretation of statutes that where in their ordinary meaning the provisions are clear and unambiguous, effect must be given to them without resorting to any aid, internal or external. It is the duty of the court to interpret the words of the law makers as used. See A.G Abia State v. A.G Federation (2005) All FWLR (Pt. 275) 414 at 450.

With specific reference to constitutional provisions, it is the law that the courts must adopt a liberal approach to the interpretation of a constitutional provision such as not to defeat the obvious ends which the constitution was designed to serve. This is so even where another interpretation which will defeat the obvious ends of the constitution is equally in accord with the words and the sense of the provisions. Accordingly, the court will opt for that interpretation which will make for the smooth working of the system which the constitution has put in place. See also the cases Tukur v. Gov’t of Gongola State (1989) 4 NWLR (Pt. 117) 517 at 579; A.G Ondo State v. A.G Ekiti State (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706 at 767 – 768.

A cursory look at Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States reveals that the objective of impeaching an officer is to remove him from office.

The principal argument against post-presidential impeachment is that the constitution does not make private citizens subject to impeachment. That is to say, on January 20th, 2021, Donald Trump would have become a private citizen after leaving office and the constitution, with respect to impeachment only applies to civil officers.

The drafters of the United States constitution did not follow the British model that allowed Parliament to impeach anyone, except for the King, and so impeachment was limited to certain public officials, including Presidents. Thus, subjecting a President to impeachment after he had returned to his private life would violate this basic constitutional principle, as the constitution itself applies only to governmental and not private actions.

This is so because, impeachment is typically seen as the indictment of a sitting office holder and removal from office is seen as the sentence. Put differently, the very concept of constitutional impeachment presupposes the impeachment, conviction and removal of a President who is, at the time of his impeachment, an incumbent in the office from which he is removed. This is even clear from the wordings of Article II, Section 4 and Article I, Section 3 of the US Constitution.

Flowing from the above, after January 20th, Donald J. Trump will cease to be the President of the United States, any impeachment trial against him will at best be an academic exercise as the Senate cannot exercise jurisdiction over him being a private citizen.

Prince Azubuike Esq.

______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com

_______________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation _______________________________________________________________________ Groundbreaking Guide For Lawyers: Adigwe Publishes ‘Artificial Intelligence For Lawyers’ With Free Research eBook The book also examines Nigeria's legal ecosystem, focusing on the LPELR and NBA AI Guidelines. As a bonus, every purchase comes with a FREE eBook titled: How to Use the AI Features in LegalPedia and LawPavilion. Ohio Books Ltd praises the publication, stating: "....this is the only Nigerian book I know of on the topic." How to Order: 📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878 📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com 🌎 Website: www.benadigwe.com Ebook Version: Access it directly online at https://selar.com/prv626 Authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe Esq., ACIarb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director at the Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria. _______________________________________________________________________