Says ”What Has Been Circulating and Widely Reported Is Actually Fake”
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/idrinstitute.png")
Taiwo Oyedele, chairman of the presidential fiscal policy and tax reforms committee, has accused critics of spreading misinformation to create fear and panic aimed at stopping the implementation of the new tax laws, while urging Nigerians to wait for the findings of lawmakers investigating alleged discrepancies in the gazetted laws.
Speaking on Channels Television’s ‘Morning Brief’ show on Monday, Oyedele said the lawmakers are best positioned to address the alleged discrepancies since they passed the bill to President Bola Tinubu for assent.
“Let’s wait for the findings of the lawmakers. If, indeed, there were alterations. And if those alterations were substantial, in other words, they’re not editorial, then the next step would be to see how best to address those issues,” he said.
On Wednesday, Abdussamad Dasuki, a member of the house of representatives from Sokoto, claimed that the gazetted tax laws available to Nigerians are different from the laws passed by the national assembly.
In response, the house of representatives constituted a seven-member committee to investigate the alleged discrepancies.
Oyedele said before anyone can claim there is a difference between the gazetted tax laws and what was passed, they must have both copies.
“We have what is gazetted, we don’t have what was passed,” the tax expert said.
“So, the official harmonised bills certified by the clerk, which the national assembly sent to the president, we don’t have the copy to compare. That’s a fundamental issue that people need to be aware of.”
“So, only the lawmakers can say authoritatively that ‘this is what we sent’. And that ‘what we sent’, shouldn’t be the house of rep version, it shouldn’t be the senate version. It should be the harmonised version certified by the clerk.
“So, I can’t say that I have it because I don’t. I only have what was presented to Mr President to sign,” he stated.
The tax expert also said “what has been circulating and also widely reported by a lot of media organisations is actually fake”.
“So, when I saw those things, you would imagine someone like me would take a very keen interest in something like that. So, I reached out to one of the members of the committee that the house of rep set up, and I said, ‘these are some of the allegations’,” he said.
“Let me even tell you the reason why I reached out. There’s a reference in one of those materials to section 41, subsection 8, that says you have to pay a deposit of 20 percent.”
Oyedele said such a provision was not in the final gazette, but appeared in the draft gazette.
“So, I reached out, and the lawmaker said that they haven’t even met. So, some people decided they should write the report of the committee before the committee met, and it has circulated everywhere,” he said.
“So, I don’t know whether it’s useful because, to be honest, I don’t want to speculate.”
Oyedele added that the committee should be allowed to conduct the investigation because “it is not just about the tax reform laws, it’s about our processes”.
“That’s how we make those processes have quality assurance, almost like a system that is so tamper-proof, like the way you print your currency or the way you print the ballot box, ballot papers. That is the way we should take legislation. It matters a lot,” he said.
He said “different versions” of legislation are often printed in the country, adding that “we saw it with Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA).”
In a separate statement, Oyedele accused critics of deliberately spreading misinformation to create fear and panic among Nigerians with the aim of stopping the implementation of the tax reform laws.
He dismissed various claims being circulated about the tax laws as false and based on misinformation designed to undermine public confidence in the reforms.
According to Oyedele, the misinformation campaign is aimed at creating confusion and resistance to the tax reforms, which are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026.
The tax reform committee chairman systematically addressed what he described as false claims and misinformation being spread about the new tax laws.
He urged Nigerians to verify information from official sources rather than relying on unverified claims circulating on social media and in some media reports.
Oyedele called on Nigerians to exercise patience and allow the house of representatives committee to complete its investigation before drawing conclusions about alleged discrepancies.
He emphasized that it would be premature to make definitive statements about alterations or discrepancies without having access to the official harmonised version certified by the clerk of the national assembly.
Oyedele’s intervention represents an attempt by the tax reform committee to counter the narrative of unauthorized alterations to the tax laws and to manage public perception ahead of the January 1, 2026 implementation date.
By questioning the authenticity of circulating materials and claiming that some allegations are based on draft rather than final versions, Oyedele is seeking to cast doubt on the claims of discrepancies.
However, his admission that he does not have access to the harmonised version certified by the clerk which would be necessary for a definitive comparison undermines his ability to categorically refute the allegations.
The controversy over alleged discrepancies has taken on political dimensions, with opposition figures including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Anambra State governor Peter Obi calling for suspension of implementation pending investigation.
The Presidency has dismissed the allegations as “opposition noise,” while insisting that implementation will proceed as scheduled on January 1, 2026.
The house of representatives committee investigating the allegations has until Thursday, December 25 (Christmas Day) to submit its report, though some lawmakers have raised concerns about this deadline falling on a public holiday.
Oyedele’s call for Nigerians to wait for the committee’s findings suggests that the outcome of the investigation will be crucial in determining whether the allegations of unauthorized alterations are substantiated.
If the committee confirms discrepancies between the harmonised version passed by the national assembly and the gazetted version, it could force a delay in implementation and require legislative action to correct the affected provisions.
However, if the committee finds no substantial alterations or concludes that any differences are merely editorial, it would vindicate the government’s position and clear the way for implementation to proceed as scheduled.
As the January 1 implementation date approaches, the pressure is mounting on the committee to complete its work and provide clarity on whether the tax laws as gazetted accurately reflect what was passed by Nigeria’s elected representatives.
A timely new publication, Casebook on Privacy & Data Protection in Nigeria, co-authored by Olumide Babalola and Uchenna Nnawuchi, 📘Casebook on Privacy & Data Protection in Nigeria is now available on Amazon: https://a.co/d/8TmFZrd
_______________________________________________________________________
[A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation
______________________________________________________________________ “Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers: A Comprehensive Guide”, authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe Esq., ACiarb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director at the Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria.
How to Order:
📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878
📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com
🌎 Website: www.benadigwe.com
Ebook Version: Access it directly online at https://selar.com/prv626
