By Richard Akinnola
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/idrinstitute.png")
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Basil-Momodu-Esq1.png")
On January 5, 1994, nine Supreme Court Justices instituted a N450m libel suit against the Weekend Concord, published by Concord Press Ltd and owned by Bashorun M.K.O. Abiola.
This was a novel legal move in the annals of Nigeria, where most of the justices of the Supreme Court would jointly file a libel action against a newspaper.
The justices were Mohammed Bello (then Chief Justice), Mohammed Lawal Uwais, Uthman Mohammed, Sylvester Onu, Abubakar Bashir Wali, Idris Legbo Kutigi, Emmanuel Ogwuegbu, Alfa Belfore and Olajide Olatawura.
The Weekend Concord had published that the justices were bribed with Mercedes-Benz cars by Nigeria’s former dictator, General Ibrahim Babangida, shortly before he left office. But the justices denied this, claiming they were not bribes but official vehicles. But the newspaper said if it was official, why did it bear the personal names of the justices? These were the legal knots to be untied in the case.
This case was pending at the Ikeja High Court, Lagos.
Following the stay of the bail granted to Abiola by the Court of Appeal, Chief G.O.K. Ajayi, SAN, Abiola’s counsel, lodged an appeal at the Supreme Court against such a stay.
But before the appeal could be argued, Chief Ajayi filed another motion before the Supreme Court, asking the justices who had sued Concord to disqualify themselves from hearing the appeal due to the likelihood of bias.
Chief Ajayi’s premise was that since the justices had libel suits against Concord Press, published by Bashorun Abiola, there was a likelihood of bias on the part of the justices if they heard Abiola’s appeal on the issue of bail.
In view of this objection, the Supreme Court Justices, who were part of the plaintiffs in the libel case, withdrew from the appeal.
The implication of this was that all nine justices who took Concord to court recused themselves from the case. One of the nine justices, Justice Olatawura, later retired, leaving only three justices who were qualified to sit, leading to a shortfall of at least two justices, since only a minimum of five justices could sit on a case at the Supreme Court and a minimum of seven justices in a constitutional case like Abiola’s appeal.
The situation perfectly suited the government. Since the government was not keen on appointing fresh justices to the Supreme Court, the case became stalled, and Abiola continued to languish in jail.
The Abacha junta had amended Section 211(2) of the 1979 constitution on the appointment of justices of the Supreme Court through the Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree No. 107 of 1993, which gave the Provisional Ruling Council, on the advice of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the power to fill vacant seats at the Supreme Court. Since it suited the government for Abiola to remain in detention, it refused to appoint more justices to the Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, the libel case was going on very well at the High Court, with Chief Gani Fawehinmi representing Concord.
I recall that in the course of the trial, the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court had given evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs. During his cross-examination, Gani was at his combative self and counsel to the plaintiffs sought the court’s protection of the witness, saying that as the CR, he deserved some respect from Gani in the course of cross-examination. But Gani countered that he had utmost respect for the CR, but in this case, he was not cross-examining the CR but a witness.
“My Lord, as long as that witness is in that witness box, I am not seeing the CR but an ordinary witness that has to be subjected to vigorous cross-examination. When he steps down from the box, I would give him his due respect as the CR, but right now, he is an ordinary wi tness,” he argued. The court agreed with Gani.
However, as the case was going on, and with Abiola’s bail appeal stuck at the Supreme Court, Dr Doyin Abiola, the Managing Director of Concord and wife of Abiola, was working on an alternative route to break the impasse. She felt that if Concord settled out of court with the Supreme Court justices and Chief Ajayi withdrew his application, the justices should not be part of the bail hearing and that Abiola would be granted bail.
As the judicial editor of Concord, Dr Abiola and I regularly reviewed the cases, almost daily. So, that afternoon, he buzzed by office intercom at Concord, summoning me to her office.
She told me she wanted an out-of-court settlement and that I should go and discuss with Gani to soften the ground before she debriefed him. I was shocked. I told her we were winning the case and that the way the trial was going had been in our favour. She was adamant, insisting that I should go and discuss it with Gani. I was also adamant that I would not go, telling her that since she was the one who briefed Gani, she should be the one to break the news to him. I knew Gani would be heartbroken, so I refused to be the purveyor of that bad news. I told Dr Abiola that she was being deceived and that Abiola would be granted bail once the case was settled out of court. We argued and argued, but she was insistent, and I also refused to cave in.
She then got angry and, in her thin voice, told me, “Richard, as your MD, I’m ordering you.”
Looking at her straight in the face, I retorted: “Sorry ma, with due respect, I will disobey you because your action would not be in the interest of the publisher.”
Shocked, she shot back: “Richard, o k’oro simi lenu.” (Richard, you disobeyed me).
I was adamant and replied: “Yes, ma. On this, I am going to disobey you.”
She momentarily looked at me and, in utter frustration, said: “Bi eyin Ondo se maa lagidi niyen.” (That’s how you Ondo people exhibit stubbornness).
I replied: “You forgot that Gani is also Ondo. So, you would still meet another ‘alagidi’ (stubborn person) in front.”
She could only intone: “Kuro l’office me joo.” (Just leave my office).
She eventually wrote to Gani to debrief him, and Gani almost went into depression because, apart from handling the case pro bono, he was very sure Concord was going to win the case. As I cautioned Dr Doyin, despite the out-of-court settlement, Abiola was never released.
The renowned journalist and media icon, Dr Doyin Abiola, died on August 5, 2025, at the age of 81.
Sleep well, MD.
Akinnola, a veteran journalist, activist and Executive Director of Centre for Free Speech Organisation, writes from Lagos
Contact & Orders 📞 0704 444 4777 | 0704 444 4999 | 0818 199 9888 🌐 www.alexandernigeria.com
______________________________________________________________________ [Now Available] -- From Crime Scene To Courtroom: An Authoritative Legal Handbook On Police Investigations
In this authoritative work, Basil Momodu Esq., titled Police Investigations in Nigeria Through the Cases 📖 Available now Call 07051822705 or any of the recommended independent booksellers listed hereunder. ______________________________________________________________________ 
“History of Rivers State Judiciary: A Compendium of Personalities on the Bench.” Authored by Ampim Gogo Blankson, Esq., Deputy Director at the Rivers State Ministry of Justice, in collaboration with the Rivers State Judiciary 💰 Cover Price: ₦20,000.00 (Twenty Thousand Naira) Bukky Law Books, Rivers State High Court Complex, Moscow Road, Port Harcourt – 📞 08034868754📞 08034729738📞 Enquiries: ______________________________________________________________________ Law Practice Kit (Second Edition) And Legal Luminaries Series 2 Unveiled 
Authored by Abdulrasheed Ibrahim, LL.M, Notary Public Law Practice Kit (Second Edition) and Legal Luminaries Series 2 📚 For Enquiries and Orders, Contact: 📞 08055476823, 📞 08164683735, 📞 08033855230 ______________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials 
