Ogun State Judge Engages LPDC, Police Over Lawyers Who Collect From Clients Claiming It Is For Judges

A judge of the Ogun State High Court has drawn the attention of the Nigerian Bar Association’s (NBA) Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) and the police to the activities of lawyers who specialise in collecting money from clients while purporting that it is meant for judges who handle their cases, Daily trust. reports.

LPDC is the unit of the NBA that carries out the function of disciplining erring lawyers.

LPDC is comprised of the Attorney General of the Federation (chairperson) and all attorneys general of the 36 states, as well as 12 lawyers of not less than 10 years standing who sit and determine the cases sent to it by the NBA.

Trouble started following revelations when the Ogun judge’s court registrar said in the open court that a litigant approached her while the court was not in session and demanded to know “whether the N250,000 cash gift that was collected from her by her lawyer has been given to the judge in order to get a favourable judgment.”

The registrar went into the judge’s chambers and disclosed exactly what the litigant told her to the judge.

The Judge, Olugboyega Ogunfowora, who was shocked, said he could even dash a lawyer N250,000, adding that he did not indulge in any activity that was expensive which he could not afford.

The judge, therefore, decided not to pass judgment and returned the case file for reassignment to another judge, as well as referred the case to the LPDC and the police.

It was further gathered that of late, this has become the habit and fashion among some lawyers. In order to get more money from their clients, they ask such clients to make separate payment (sometimes running into hundreds of thousands or even millions of naira) for publicity and for judges who handle their cases. But neither the judge nor the press will be given such money which will be pocketed by the lawyer in addition to his/her legal fees.

Barr. Sikiruudeen Roberts said, “A good percentage of lawyers take the bribe in the name of the judge and take it for themselves and inform their clients that they had concluded the deal. In the event of losing the case, they would say that the other side had given a larger amount. Very rarely is the judge bribed.”

Some lawyers have commended the court registrar that reported the matter to her judge, and that if she had not reported the matter to the judge, there was no way the court would be aware of such practice.

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) who was in court, also related his experience before another judge.

The SAN said he took over a case from a lawyer that had earlier handled it who had told his client to give monetary gift to the judge, and that the lawyer never gave any money to the judge.

He said the lawyer went into the judge’s chambers with a brief case loaded with money in the presence of the client and came out without dropping a dime, and that the client then went to his friends and told them the lawyer had collected money for the judge.

The judge later got to know about the issue but never disclosed to anyone. So In most cases judges are unaware of these practices.