By Simeon Akala

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the Electoral Act 2026 was enacted, and there have been legal upheavals as to the grounds of bringing election petition under Section 138(1) of the said Act, which was previously three but now reduced to just two. Many party opposition and adherents have argued that it was a mischievous legislative amendment, to primarily favour the ruling party APC( All Progressive Congress).

To this end, there have been full blown agitations here and there from electronic transmission of results and upload and many more looming electoral concerns. My commentary focused on the above subject; to examine if the section of the Act conflicts with the 1999 Constitution or whether it was a mere amendment, if not what is the intent of the Makers of the law vis-a-vis the supremacy of the Constitution.

ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT MATTER

The provisions of Section 138(1) of Electoral Act 2026, contemplates that the two grounds of bringing an election petition is either if the electoral process is not in compliance with the Electoral Act and if a Candidate does not have the majority of total votes cast in an election, hence disqualification or qualification of Candidates is non-existent, hence such matter is not worthy of contention in Court.

However, Section 134(1) of the Act provides that election must be done in compliance and accordance with the Constitution. Yet, the Act is now silent on the issue of qualification. The Constitution provides under Sections, 65,66, 106, 107,131,137,177 & 182, various qualifications requirements for each electoral contestant. So is the Act inconsistent with the Constitution or which is supreme? Or is eligibility of candidates contesting for an election necessary?

Furthermore, the supremacy of the Constitution is in section 1(1) and 1(3). By virtue of section 1(3) thereof,

“if any other law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other to the extent of the inconsistency be void”.

In UGBOJI V. STATE (2017)LPELR-43427(SC), the Nigerian apex court, per Amiru Sanusi, JSC (Pp. 23-23, paras B-D), held thus:

“My lords, permit me to reiterate that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, had by Section One, made provision to emphasise or assert its supremacy. By that provision, any law/statute or provisions thereof that runs riot and violent to the provisions of the Constitution or is in conflict with the constitutional provision is null and void to the extent of inconsistency. See A.G. ONDO STATE V. A.G. OF THE FEDERATION AND ORS (2002) 9 NWLR (Pt 772) 226.”

It is my opinion that qualification is a Constitutional matter and is necessary as a subject of litigation. If the Constitution has expressly mentioned the factors by interpretation ( Expressio Unius Est Exclusion Alterius) what qualifies or disqualifies a Candidate in an election it remains so, See PORTS AND CARGO HANDLINGS SERVICES CO LTD & ORS V. MIGFO (NIG) LTD & ANOR (2012) LPELR-9725(SC); so the Act cannot preclude Petitioners from raising serious objections by seeking to curtail by itself the provisions of the Constitution, as this will birth unforseen absurdities.

Conclusively, this is a crucial issue that hangs like the sword of damocles on our electoral system and simply like every other legal minds awaits judicial clarification, as against the backdrop of both Pre-Election and particularly Election petition.

Simeon Akala writes from Edo State
08110468699
simeonakala217@gmail.com

______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com

_______________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation ______________________________________________________________________ “Bridging Theory And Courtroom Practice” — Hagler Sunny Okorie, Nathaniel Ngozi Ikeocha Unveil ‘Functional’ Tort Law Book For Nigerian Legal System The book, titled The Law of Torts in Nigeria: A Functional Approach, authored by Professor Hagler Sunny Okorie Ph.D and Ikeocha, Nathaniel Ngozi Esq, offers law students, practitioners, and academics a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying tort law in Nigerian courts. Interested buyers can place orders via the following contact numbers: 08028636615, 08037667945, 08032253813, or +234 902 196 2209. _______________________________________________________________________

“Order Your Copy Now” — Basil Momodu, Esq. Unveils Second Edition Of His Book, "Civil Procedure In Nigeria"

According to the learned author, Basil Momodu Esq. "Law review is a continuum. We will continue to track changes in the law to enrich future editions." Recommended Booksellers: Lagos: 08033855230, Abuja: 08035991379, and others.