As the debate over direct primaries rage, the resident electoral commissioner (REC) in Akwa Ibom State, Mike Igini, has warned that it might ruin the entire Electoral Act Amendment Bill just like the infamous “third term” saga ruined the good bills the lawmakers of the Fifth Assembly had promulgated at the time.

Igini likened the anxiety generated by the debate on the mode of party primaries to the third term controversy that led to throwing away the constitution amendment bill by the National Assembly in 2006.

Recalls that the 5th Assembly threw out important amendments to the constitution because of an inclusion of a “third term” clause for the presidency.

The inclusion of the clause by the current National Assembly for all political parties to adopt direct primary has led to an intense contention between governors and lawmakers.

Although the signed bill has since been sent to President Muhammadu Buhari for assent, the president has however written a letter to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) seeking its advice on the bill.

But while speaking on INEC’s position on the raging debate over the use of direct and indirect primaries by political parties, Igini said, “There’s nothing inherently so good or bad about indirect or direct primary to warrant the ongoing acrimony that may affect other profound provisions of the current bill given that this issue of direct primary is just one item in the entire one bill.

“We must avoid a repeat of the 3rd term situation whereby just one obnoxious item in a single bill truncated the entire bill. We must bear in mind that one common formula for success in any approach chosen depends on the sincerity of those who lead and manage these parties as well as those who participate in those primaries conducted by political parties.”

He added that unless political party members sincerely submit themselves to the due process they subscribe to, hopes of achieving success in whatever method of primaries they subscribe to will be futile.

“From our political experience in this country, one of the biggest political challenges has been the inability of political parties to organise primaries without squabbles. Whenever they manage to do so, it has always been seen as a remarkable achievement whereas it should be something of a routine.

“Looking beyond the problems to the solution, our take is that whatever mode that we subscribe to, political parties should do the following: a mandatory submission within a reasonable time – before any primary election certified – true copies of verifiable party register of members of each ward or delegate list for the election and certified true copies of party guidelines for same election submitted to INEC and published on the party website, as well as two newspapers displayed in all LGA offices of the party within the constituency of the election.”

He also dismissed the argument that direct primaries would cause a huge financial burden on INEC, adding that no mode of primary is cost-free.

He said the commission had always spent money to mobilise staff it deployed to monitor either direct or indirect primaries in the past.

“There is absolutely nothing new about this issue of financial burden argument. What the political parties have done in the past – because the Commission bears the burden alone – was that after giving notice to the Commission of the date, time, and venue and after the commission’s staff had all been mobilised, even some staff from the headquarters in Abuja, suddenly officials of parties will send notice to the states few hours to the time that the exercise is suspended, and sometimes it may even be a message of outright cancellation received at the venue of the scheduled primaries while mobilised INEC staff and their members are waiting for party officials that will conduct the primary.

“As a result, funds and time committed are all wasted. We are just monitors of compliance to guidelines set out by political parties to regulate their affairs; it’s not the commission that conducts the primary. Why so much noise and concerns about the cost of monitoring by INEC and a loud silence over the cost of the exercise itself by the political parties? Why are people not talking about the cost to be incurred by the political parties but INEC’s, cost of monitoring and, by implication, dragging the Commission into the arena of a subject matter that has now assumed partisan dimensions? We have been conducting elections in 119,973 polling units, deploying staff.

“And in the 2023 election, the Commission will conduct an election in a total of 176,846 polling units. So, what is this hue and cry about monitoring primary exercises in just 8,809 registration areas or wards compared to several polling units in general elections? We should simply make up our minds on what we want to do with the greatest promise and hope of democracy, which is participation, whether it should be given meaning and purpose in our practiced democracy,” he said.

In a related development, INEC has lamented that the debate over mode of primaries has overshadowed other fundamental issues in the bill.

In its official comment to a letter written by President Muhammadu Buhari over the contentious Electoral Act amendment, the INEC national commissioner and chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC), Festus Okoye, said it is conventionally rational, strategic and fundamental for the president to seek the opinion of the commission and other critical agencies in the electoral matrix before a new legal framework becomes law.

According to him, “The President has requested the commission and other critical national institutions to revert with detailed and considered views indicating whether or not he should assent to the Bill.

“This is the democratic way to go and the commission will make its views known to the president, bearing in mind the overriding national interest and the interest of our democracy.”

He said the commission will go through the Bill and revert to the president within the time frame given to it.

He said the commission is aware that Nigerians are waiting for this Bill and is also conscious of the fact that a comprehensive, clear, unambiguous and forward looking electoral legal framework is germane to the early preparation for election.

Stating that the regulations and guidelines of the commission are drawn from the Electoral Act, he said without a new electoral legal framework, the work of the commission will be tentative and that will not be good for the electoral process.

On the cost implication, Okoye said that it is rather unfortunate that the issue of direct or indirect primaries has overshadowed other fundamental issues in the Bill.

He continued, “However, it is difficult at this stage to speculate on the cost implications of direct primaries. As of today, the Bill is inchoate until the president assents to it.

“It is the constitutional and legal responsibility of the commission to give effect to laws passed by the National Assembly.

“Moreover, direct primaries have been a feature of our electoral legal framework. The commission has monitored direct and indirect primaries organised by the different political parties. The commission does not dictate to political parties on the mode of primaries to adopt.

“The new system of direct primaries proposed in the Bill domiciles the conditions for the conduct of primaries with the political parties. In other words, the procedure adopted for the direct primaries shall be spelt out in a guideline to be issued by the political party and filed with the Commission at least 14 days before the primary election.”

He added that the commission is obligated to monitor the primaries of political parties in the centres designated by the political parties.

The INEC national commissioner noted that while some political parties may designate the Polling Units (PUs) of the commission for the conduct of their primaries, some may designate the registration area centres (wards), some may designate the local government areas, and some may designate a centre within the state.

“Some may stagger their primaries. So, the commission is not involved in the debate around direct and indirect primaries and will implement the law as signed by the President. Both direct and indirect primaries involve cost and personnel and the commission will at the appropriate time design its own matrix of actualising the intendment of the law,” he added.

On online transmission of results, Okoye said that the commission had been uploading polling unit level results into its central result viewing portal for public viewing.

He said that this had ensured accountability and trust between Nigerians and the commission.

“The commission has been piloting different electronic solutions for online transmission of election results. The commission has the capacity and the requisite technological knowhow and knowledge to transmit the results of elections,” Okoye said

Speaking on the plans with vendors, he said that voting in an election shall be in accordance with the procedure determined by the commission.

He said that as soon as the Bill is signed into law, the commission will meet and make a determination relating to the procedure to be adopted by the commission.

He said, “The commission is rational and responsible and will introduce relevant technology in the electoral process when it is ready and when the technology has been tested and found to be robust.”

"Exciting news! TheNigeriaLawyer is now on WhatsApp Channels 🚀 Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest legal insights!" Click here! ....................................................................................................................... Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material and other digital content on this website, in whole or in part, without express and written permission from TheNigeriaLawyer, is strictly prohibited _________________________________________________________________ [Register Now] ILA Nigeria Branch Marks 10 Years With Infrastructure Financing As Theme For 7th Annual Conference The International Law Association - Nigeria Branch 7th annual conference on public-private partnerships for sustainable infrastructure financing, April 4-5 in Abuja. Details: https://ilanigeria.org.ng/conference _________________________________________________________________

NIALS' Compendia Series: Your One-Stop Solution For Navigating Nigerian Laws (2004-2023)

Email: info@nials.edu.ng, tugomak@yahoo.co.uk, Contact: For Inquiry and information, kindly contact, NIALS Director of Marketing: +2348074128732, +2348100363602.