The Obidient Movement has formally distanced itself from what it described as unauthorised groups and individuals allegedly operating parallel structures in the name of the movement, warning members of the public, media organisations, and supporters both within and outside Nigeria against associating with any group operating under “derivative or deceptively similar identities,” as Nigerians reacted on social media with widespread mockery of those behind the alleged impostor organisations.
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/TheNigerialawyer-WhatsApp-Channel1.jpg")
In a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, the movement stated that it had become aware of “activities and announcements by certain individuals and groups attempting to operate under names and structures deliberately designed to create confusion around the identity, leadership, and direction of the Obidient Movement.”
The statement comes at a critical moment for the movement, days after its principal, Peter Obi, formally left the ADC and joined the Nigeria Democratic Congress alongside former Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, a transition that has placed the movement’s organisational coherence under strain as it migrates from one party platform to another.
Tanko was emphatic in rejecting any group claiming to represent the movement outside its recognised leadership framework.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the Obidient Movement recognises no parallel structure, faction, or alternative leadership outside its established and recognised leadership framework aligned with His Excellency, Peter Obi,” Tanko stated.
“Attempts to create confusion, misrepresent the movement’s identity, or exploit its growing influence for ulterior interests will not distract us from our mission and ongoing engagement with Nigerians across all levels,” the National Coordinator added.
The statement did not name the specific groups or individuals accused of operating parallel structures, but the timing suggests the movement is responding to entities that have emerged in the space created by Obi’s rapid transition from the Labour Party to the ADC and now to the NDC, with some groups potentially positioning themselves as alternative custodians of the “Obidient” brand.
Tanko issued a specific caution to media organisations, urging them not to give coverage or legitimacy to groups falsely claiming to represent the movement.
“The public, media organisations, supporters across Nigeria and the diaspora, and all stakeholders are hereby advised that any group operating under derivative or deceptively similar identities does not represent the Obidient Movement, its values, or its leadership,” Tanko stated.
The warning to media organisations is pointed. If television stations or other outlets cover events organised by parallel groups as if they represent the Obidient Movement, they risk amplifying confusion and lending credibility to entities that the movement considers imposters.
The movement urged its supporters to “remain united and rely only on officially recognised communication channels for information concerning its activities,” signalling concern that misinformation may be circulated through unofficial channels to create division within the support base.
Reaffirming its commitment to its founding ideals, the movement stated it remained focused on “promoting integrity, accountability, and justice in pursuit of a New Nigeria.”
The Obidient Movement emerged as a major political force during the 2023 general election, galvanising millions of young Nigerians and supporters across social media and grassroots platforms around Obi’s presidential ambition. The movement played a decisive role in Obi’s performance in the election, where he polled over six million votes and won Lagos State, a feat that no opposition candidate from the South-East had previously achieved.
Since then, the movement has followed Obi through his transition from the Labour Party to the ADC and now to the NDC, with its organisational structures adapting to each platform change. The speed of these transitions, and the political uncertainty they create, may have provided an opening for opportunistic groups to establish parallel structures under similar names.
The social media reaction to the parallel structures was overwhelmingly one of ridicule, with Nigerians dismissing those behind the alleged impostor organisations as opportunists and attention-seekers.
“These people no dey tire?” one user asked, capturing the exasperation of many who viewed the parallel structures as yet another attempt to undermine the opposition through manufactured confusion.
“Same script everyday,” another user commented, suggesting a familiar pattern of destabilisation that the opposition has attributed to government interference.
“Clowns,” multiple users stated, dismissing those involved as unserious actors.
“Shameless set of humans,” another user wrote, reflecting the contempt directed at those accused of exploiting the movement’s name for personal gain or political sabotage.
Several users directed their criticism at media organisations that covered events organised by the parallel groups. “And your station foolishly covered it,” one user stated, tagging a television station. Another user tagged Arise TV with a blunt two-word rebuke, expressing anger that mainstream media had given airtime to what the movement considers fraudulent organisations.
“Is this how low they can go?” one user asked, while others responded with strings of laughing emojis that conveyed the mixture of amusement and disbelief with which many Nigerians greeted the development.
While the Obidient Movement’s statement does not explicitly accuse the government of sponsoring the parallel structures, the development fits within the broader narrative that the opposition has consistently articulated: that the ruling party systematically creates confusion within opposition movements through sponsored factions, litigation, and organisational sabotage.
Obi himself, upon joining the NDC, stated that “the same Nigerian state and its agents that created unnecessary crises and hostility within the Labour Party now appear to be finding their way into the ADC,” and pleaded with the government: “Please don’t come here. We want to have peace.”
The emergence of parallel Obidient structures, whether organically generated by disaffected members or externally sponsored by political opponents, represents another front in the ongoing battle over the opposition’s organisational integrity ahead of 2027.
For a movement that derives its strength from the personal loyalty of millions of supporters to Peter Obi, the risk posed by impostor organisations is less about splitting the support base, which remains firmly aligned with Obi, and more about creating confusion in the public perception of what the movement represents and who speaks for it.
The Obidient Movement faces a unique challenge as an unregistered, personality-driven political movement that operates across multiple party platforms. Unlike a registered political party with formal structures, constitutional provisions, and INEC recognition, the Obidient Movement exists as a brand, a network, and a shared identity that is defined more by loyalty to Obi’s vision than by institutional membership.
This informality, which was the movement’s strength during the 2023 campaign when it enabled rapid mobilisation without bureaucratic constraints, becomes a vulnerability when others attempt to appropriate the brand. Without formal registration or trademark protection, the “Obidient” name can be adopted by anyone, making it difficult to enforce exclusivity through legal means alone.
Tanko’s statement, by publicly defining the movement’s leadership and warning against “derivative or deceptively similar identities,” is an attempt to assert brand authority through public communication rather than legal mechanisms.
Whether this is sufficient to prevent the proliferation of parallel structures, or whether the movement will need to take more formal steps to protect its identity as the 2027 campaign intensifies, remains to be seen.
As Tanko stated: “Attempts to create confusion, misrepresent the movement’s identity, or exploit its growing influence for ulterior interests will not distract us from our mission.”
The mission continues. The distractions, it appears, continue too.
Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via:
0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888
Website: www.alexandernigeria.com
Reimagine your practice with the power of AI “...this is the only Nigerian book I know of on the topic.” — Ohio Books Ltd
Authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe, Esq., ACIArb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director, Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria.
Bonus:
Get a FREE eBook titled “How to Use the AI in Legalpedia and Law Pavilion” with every purchase.
How to Order: 📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878 📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com 🌐 Website: www.benadigwe.com
Ebook Version: Access directly online at: https://selar.com/prv626
_______________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
The book, titled The Law of Torts in Nigeria: A Functional Approach, authored by Professor Hagler Sunny Okorie Ph.D and Ikeocha, Nathaniel Ngozi Esq, offers law students, practitioners, and academics a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying tort law in Nigerian courts. Interested buyers can place orders via the following contact numbers: 08028636615, 08037667945, 08032253813, or +234 902 196 2209.
