The Delta State High Court, Warri, presided over by Hon. Justice Anthony O. Akpovi, has delivered a landmark judgment in Suit No. W/311/FHR/2024: John Aikpokpo-Martins v. Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) & 4 Ors., ruling that the restriction of university admissions to candidates aged 16 and above is unconstitutional.

The case, filed by John Aikpokpo-Martins as a public interest litigation, challenged JAMB’s policy, arguing that it violates sections 18(1) and 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. Aikpokpo-Martins contended that the restriction discriminates against qualified candidates based solely on age, thereby denying them equal educational opportunities as guaranteed under the Constitution.

  • The 16-year minimum admission age violates constitutional rights: The court held that JAMB’s age restriction contradicts the fundamental right to freedom from discrimination as enshrined in section 42 of the 1999 Constitution.
  • JAMB’s October 16, 2024 circular is null and void: The court set aside the directive signed by JAMB’s official, Mohammed A. Babaji, which mandated universities to admit only candidates who turn 16 by August 31, 2025.
  • Universities must admit all qualified candidates regardless of age: The court ordered all respondents, including JAMB and Nigerian universities, to issue admission letters to candidates who meet all academic requirements, regardless of their birth date.
  • JAMB is permanently restrained from enforcing the age restriction: The court granted an order of perpetual injunction barring JAMB and all universities from denying admission solely on the basis of age.

During proceedings, A. O. Mohammed, SAN, counsel for JAMB, argued that the court lacked jurisdiction, asserting that section 18(1) of the 1999 Constitution—which mandates equal educational opportunities—is non-justiciable as it falls under Chapter 2 of the Constitution.

However, J. O. Aikpokpo-Martins, Esq., who represented himself, countered that when a non-justiciable provision is combined with a justiciable one—in this case, section 42 (freedom from discrimination)—it becomes enforceable in court.

Justice Akpovi agreed with Aikpokpo-Martins’ argument, ruling that the age restriction violated the constitutional rights of affected candidates and was therefore unlawful, null, and void.

This ruling effectively removes all age restrictions for university admissions in Nigeria. Any candidate—regardless of age—who meets the admission requirements for their chosen course and university is now eligible for admission.

JAMB and other stakeholders are yet to respond to the ruling.

______________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation ________________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com

_______________________________________________________________________