The U.S. Constitution establishes just one requirement for the job of Supreme Court justice: “good Behaviour.” It specifies that members of the country’s top judicial body are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

The details were left to lawmakers to work out — or fight over, as they have pointedly in recent years as conservatives and liberals have battled for dominance in the court.

The current rules give Republican President Donald Trump a shot at replacing liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died Sept. 18, and strengthening the conservative majority on the court even before he faces voters in elections Nov. 3. Democrats argue precedent should rule that out.

1. How does Senate confirmation work?
Traditionally, three-fifths of the Senate, or 60 of 100 members, had to agree to end the debate over a Supreme Court nominee and take a final vote. With no party holding that many seats during a Supreme Court confirmation in four decades, the rule had assured at least some bipartisan support for candidates. In 2017, Senate Democrats, who then as now were in the minority, blocked a vote to approve Trump’s first nominee, Neil Gorsuch. In response, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell invoked the “nuclear option” and called for a simple majority vote, which passed, allowing Gorsuch to be confirmed and lowering the threshold for future high court picks. The move facilitated the confirmation of Trump’s second appointee, Brett Kavanaugh, and would ease a vote on his choice to succeed Ginsburg.

2. Why do Democrats say precedent should prevent that?
In February 2016, President Barack Obama, a Democrat in his last year as president, had an opportunity to make a third Supreme Court nomination when conservative Justice Antonin Scalia died. But after Obama nominated Merrick Garland the next month to fill the seat, Republican senators refused to hold confirmation hearings on the grounds that it was an election year. Democrats say that Republicans should be bound by their own logic in this election year.

3. Could a justice be confirmed in the time before the election?
The Senate would need to move faster than usual to confirm a nominee that quickly. The process typically involves one-on-one meetings between the nominee and individual senators over many weeks. The Senate Judiciary Committee requires the nominee to complete a lengthy background questionnaire and usually conducts a week of hearings followed by a vote two weeks later in the full Senate. The average time from nomination to Senate vote was 69.6 days for the 15 candidates prior to Kavanaugh, according to a 2018 report from the Congressional Research Service.

The Reference Shelf
A Congressional Research Service report on related Senate rules.
The Supreme Court of the United States’s website details its current members, their circuit assignments, audio recordings of oral arguments and information on how to visit the court.
Martin-Quinn Scores measure the relative locations of the Supreme Court justices on an ideological continuum.
A Journal of Politics paper: “Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions: A Study of Ideological Drift on the United States Supreme Court.”

Culled from bloomberglaw.com

Follow Our WhatsApp Channel ______________________________________________________________________ “Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence

Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via: 0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888 Website: www.alexandernigeria.com

______________________________________________________________________ “Bridging Theory And Courtroom Practice” — Hagler Sunny Okorie, Nathaniel Ngozi Ikeocha Unveil ‘Functional’ Tort Law Book For Nigerian Legal System The book, titled The Law of Torts in Nigeria: A Functional Approach, authored by Professor Hagler Sunny Okorie Ph.D and Ikeocha, Nathaniel Ngozi Esq, offers law students, practitioners, and academics a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying tort law in Nigerian courts. Interested buyers can place orders via the following contact numbers: 08028636615, 08037667945, 08032253813, or +234 902 196 2209. _______________________________________________________________________ ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR LAWYERS: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE Reimagine your practice with the power of AI “...this is the only Nigerian book I know of on the topic.” — Ohio Books Ltd Authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe, Esq., ACIArb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director, Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria. Bonus: Get a FREE eBook titled “How to Use the AI in Legalpedia and Law Pavilion” with every purchase.

How to Order: 📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878 📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com 🌐 Website: www.benadigwe.com

Ebook Version: Access directly online at: https://selar.com/prv626

________________________________________________________________________ [A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
“Evidence Act: Complete Annotation” by renowned legal experts Sanni & Etti.
Available now for NGN 40,000 at ASC Publications, 10, Boyle Street, Onikan, Lagos. Beside High Court, TBS. Email publications@ayindesanni.com or WhatsApp +2347056667384. Purchase Link: https://paystack.com/buy/evidence-act-complete-annotation ____________________________________________________