The Federal Government of Nigeria has formally rejected the endorsement of former Senegalese President, Macky Sall, as the African Union’s consensus candidate for the position of United Nations Secretary-General, describing the move as procedurally flawed and diplomatically questionable.
![](https://thenigerialawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/TheNigerialawyer-WhatsApp-Channel1.jpg")
In a diplomatic note addressed to the African Union Commission, Nigeria said the decision to nominate Sall was reached in violation of established procedures and long-standing principles guiding multilateral engagements.
The protest, contained in a Note Verbale dated March 27, 2026, was issued by Nigeria’s Mission to the African Union and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa in Addis Ababa.
Nigeria stated that it “takes exception” to the nomination and has officially entered a reservation as a member state, stressing that its objection is rooted in “procedure and principle,” and not directed at Sall personally or his country.
“The Federal Republic of Nigeria believes that established procedures and principles were not followed in taking this decision,” the note read.
Nigeria further argued that the AU’s endorsement disregards the long-standing principle of regional rotation for the office of the UN Secretary-General, warning that such a move could undermine Africa’s credibility in global diplomacy.
According to the Nigerian government, it is widely acknowledged that the next Secretary-General of the United Nations should emerge from the South American and Caribbean region.
The note pointedly added that Africa recognises the Caribbean as its “sixth region,” making the AU’s decision to back an African candidate both premature and inconsistent with diplomatic conventions.
“By jettisoning this established practice, the Federal Republic of Nigeria believes that the African Union is putting its position and interest in jeopardy now and in the future,” Nigeria warned.
Nigeria also faulted the process leading to Sall’s nomination, describing it as rushed and lacking transparency.
The Nigerian government said the decision came as a surprise to member states, who were allegedly given little time to review or deliberate on the candidacy.
It further criticised the failure to subject the nomination to the AU’s Ministerial Candidature Committee, a body traditionally responsible for vetting such high-profile endorsements.
“The candidate is being fielded for such a coveted position by the Union, and Member States are given such a short time to consider the decision,” Nigeria noted.
The development signals a potential diplomatic rift within the African Union, as Nigeria, one of the continent’s most influential member states, publicly challenges the bloc’s internal decision-making process.
While reiterating its commitment to multilateralism and a rule-based international order, Nigeria urged the AU to adhere strictly to established norms and procedures in order to safeguard the continent’s collective interests on the global stage.
Nigeria reiterated “the assurances of its highest consideration and esteem” to the AU Commission, despite the sharp disagreement.
The controversy followed a recent decision by the Bureau of the Assembly of the African Union to rally behind Sall as Africa’s preferred candidate for the next UN Secretary-General position, expected to become vacant at the end of the tenure of current UN chief, António Guterres.
Sall, who completed his tenure as Senegal’s president in 2024, has remained active in international diplomacy and climate advocacy, positioning himself as a statesman with global appeal.
His emergence as a consensus candidate reportedly followed internal consultations among select AU leaders seeking to project a unified African voice early in the global selection process.
Supporters within the AU are said to have argued that putting forward a high-profile African candidate ahead of other regions could strengthen the continent’s bargaining power in negotiations surrounding the UN’s top job.
However, critics, like Nigeria, argue that the move bypassed broader consultation with member states and ignored the informal but widely respected global rotation principle that influences the selection of the UN Secretary-General.
The book, titled The Law of Torts in Nigeria: A Functional Approach, authored by Professor Hagler Sunny Okorie Ph.D and Ikeocha, Nathaniel Ngozi Esq, offers law students, practitioners, and academics a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying tort law in Nigerian courts. Interested buyers can place orders via the following contact numbers: 08028636615, 08037667945, 08032253813, or +234 902 196 2209.
______________________________________________________________________
[A MUST HAVE] Evidence Act Demystified With Recent And Contemporary Cases And Materials
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR LAWYERS: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE
Reimagine your practice with the power of AI “...this is the only Nigerian book I know of on the topic.” — Ohio Books Ltd
Authored by Ben Ijeoma Adigwe, Esq., ACIArb (UK), LL.M, Dip. in Artificial Intelligence, Director, Delta State Ministry of Justice, Asaba, Nigeria.
Bonus:
Get a FREE eBook titled “How to Use the AI in Legalpedia and Law Pavilion” with every purchase.
How to Order: 📞 Call, Text, or WhatsApp: 08034917063 | 07055285878 📧 Email: benadigwe1@gmail.com 🌐 Website: www.benadigwe.com
Ebook Version: Access directly online at: https://selar.com/prv626
________________________________________________________________________ The Law And Practice Of Redundancy In Nigeria: A Practitioner’s Guide, Authored By A Labour & Employment Law Expert Bimbo Atilola
_______________________________________________________________________
“Enhance Legal Practice With Authoritative Reports” — Alexander Payne Offers Comprehensive Law Reports, Spanning Over A Century Of Nigerian Jurisprudence
Interested buyers are encouraged to place their orders and enquiries via:
0704 444 4777, 0704 444 4999, 0818 199 9888
Website: www.alexandernigeria.com
