All manner of undemocratic practices have continued to characterise Nigeria’s political space especially as the 2019 general elections draw closer. Two weeks ago, the brewing political crisis in the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly assumed a worrisome dimension when five lawmakers, whose seats had been declared vacant by the Speaker, allegedly sought to impeach the speaker of the 26-member Assembly and the state governor. The speaker, Onofiok Luke, had declared their seats vacant when the five lawmakers defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressives Congress. The speaker had said his action was in line with Section 109 subsection 1(g) of the 1999 Constitution as amended. The incident brings to the fore a popular statement in a letter written on August 10, 1794 by a former President of the United States, George Washington, to Charles Mynn Thruston, the leader of a regiment in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. Washington said, “But if the laws are to be so trampled upon—with impunity—and a minority (a small one too) is to dictate to the majority, nothing but anarchy and confusion is to be expected thereafter.” The statement above aptly captures the scenario that played out at the Assembly complex in Uyo, the Akwa Ibom State capital, penultimate Tuesday. But it is equally worthy of note that the drama at the Assembly is not the first of its kind in Nigeria’s political space. Just a few weeks ago, nine members of the 26-member Ondo State House of Assembly, including the former speaker, Mr. Bamidele Oloyeloogun, and his deputy, Mr. Ogundeji Iroju, both of whom had been impeached by the House, sat at a plenary and said they had suspended the 15 members that impeached Oloyeloogun and Iroju. The lawmakers, who are said to be loyal to the state governor, Rotimi Akeredolu, at the plenary and amid tight security also said they had dissolved all standing committees, appointed three new principal officers and amended the 2018 budget. While all these were happening, the 15 members alleged threat to their lives and claimed they had been forced to leave the state. The needless political dramas have also happened in the federal legislative chambers in the past and in recent times. During the Goodluck Jonathan administration, some lawmakers had scaled the fence to prevent the impeachment of Aminu Tambuwal, the Speaker of the House of Representatives after his defection from the PDP to the APC. A few months ago, security agencies allegedly connived with some political stakeholders to invade the National Assembly as part of rumoured plot to impeach Senate President Bukola Saraki and Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu. Sadly, undemocratic moves of this nature date back to the era when former President Olusegun Obasanjo ruled the country between 1999 and 2007. In 2006, for example, the then governor of Plateau State, Joshua Dariye, was impeached by five out of the 24 members, even though among other conditions stipulated in Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the motion for the impeachment of a governor or his deputy shall be supported by not less than two-thirds majority of all its members. Also, on January 12, 2006, a former governor of Oyo State, Rashidi Ladoja, was impeached by 18 out of the 32 members of the Assembly, instead of the two-thirds (22) stipulated by the constitution. The Court of Appeal sitting in Ibadan, which later overturned the removal, described the impeachment process as illegal, unconstitutional, null and void. The Presiding Judge, J. O. Jegede identified the faulty processes to include the sitting of the legislators in an hotel rather than the State House of Assembly to deliberate on the impeachment; sending the notice of impeachment through the newspapers; impeachment carried out by 18 rather than 22 legislators. Similarly, the impeachment of a former governor of Anambra State, Mr Peter Obi, in 2006 by the House of Assembly was later set aside by the Court of Appeal in Enugu and the Supreme Court successively. The two courts described the impeachment process as illegal and null and void. The Appeal Court said Obi was not duly served the motion for impeachment and that the notice published in a national newspaper was addressed to the Secretary to the State Government and not Obi himself. Meanwhile, lawyers and analysts who spoke to our correspondent pointed out that there had been recurrences of such undemocratic practices because politicians were not made to face the consequences of violating due processes. A senior lawyer, Chief Robert Clarke, SAN, said the latest drama in Akwa Ibom State showed that lawmakers in the country had not learnt their lessons, given the past rulings by the courts on such matters. He pointed out that even though the lawmakers knew their action was wrong, they would continue to take such “illegal” steps because they felt there would not be any consequence for violating the due process. Clarke explained that if the trend was not checked, it could plunge the country into crisis. He said, “If indeed the five members planned to impeach the speaker and the governor, my honest opinion is that our lawmakers in Nigeria have never learnt a lesson. They are driving this country into danger and it may take us time to get out from it. “The lawmakers know what they are doing is wrong, but they would do it to create disorder and damn the consequence; they know that nothing would come out of it. That is the impunity we have in Nigeria today; impunity to steal money, divert national wealth and do many illegal things. That impunity has been given to them by this constitution. “I have always said that the 1999 Constitution is the problem we have in Nigeria today. It is a constitution that is so rotten and people and the politicians are taking advantage of it. Until we jettison that constitution, we can never make progress in Nigeria and to jettison it, we need God’s presence to send a super force to drive all these crooks away.” Clarke added, “The Supreme Court has in Inakoju’s case laid down a solid foundation for any House of Assembly to impeach a sitting governor or a speaker. If you do not have the required constitutional majority, you do not start a process of that nature. But you see, in Nigeria, the rule of law has been trampled upon so much, unfortunately, not only by the politicians but even the judiciary itself. “The United States Ambassador to Nigeria (William Symington) said a few weeks ago that the problem of corruption in Nigeria is not just financial but the disregard for justice and rule of law. So, if these politicians are not taught a lesson, they will get this country into ruins.” The lawyer to Ladoja when the Supreme Court reinstated him as the governor, Mr Yusuf Ali (SAN), while responding to questions posed by our correspondent, expressed disappointment that some politicians had not learnt their lessons from past events. He said, “After Ladoja’s case, in which I was privileged to have been his lawyer when he was restored as the governor, one would have thought that lessons would have been learnt but our legislators sometimes behave like adolescents. I think the maturity that is necessary for people to reflect properly before taking actions is lacking in most of these legislators. And I think it doesn’t speak well of the system. “Many of our political leaders behave like toddlers and it is unfortunate. I think many of them don’t really understand the ethos of democracy and rule of law and it’s a carry-over from our days under military rule, and that is why many of them who have some little authority believe that they can do anything and unfortunately because in our system there are no consequences, impunity is virtually promoted. “There should be sanctions imposed on people who try such things. For political office holders, the punishment in other places is for them to be rejected at the poll, but in our own system, it’s very interesting that votes hardly count when it matters most and that is why in our electoral system the more you look the less you see, and it’s a real problem.” Asked if constitutional amendment might be a way out, he said, “Even if you say we need to amend the constitution, who would do that? These same people? The solution is when we have very acute electorate and the electoral system is sane, then you can be very sure that when people misbehave as elected officials, the electorate would vote them out of office.” A popular Lagos-based lawyer and public affairs analyst, Mr Jiti Ogunye, said he would first doubt the veracity of the claim that the five lawmakers sat to impeach the speaker and the governor, given politicians’ penchant for making false claims. He said, “My immediate reaction is to say how would five persons even dare, imagine or contemplate to impeach the governor. So, is that the truth or the governor just said that to justify the invasion, because the governor ordinarily is not expected to lead a large crowd of people to disrupt legislative house proceedings, even if those proceedings were illegitimate and of course in this case that it was illegitimate. So, I doubted it. “But, assuming that those five errant members really wanted to start an impeachment procedure and they weren’t just engaged in a game of legislative showmanship and braggadocio to demonstrate that nobody could expel them from the House, of course there is no rational human being that will not decry it and then you wonder how those five would do it. “If they generate the notice to the Chief Judge of the state, how would the Chief Judge receive it and there are specific timelines in impeachment procedure that should be followed. That is why I’m saying that the claim had to be taken with a pinch of salt. “So, the point I’m making is that if those five legislators wanted to do that, it would mean that our politicians, in particular legislators, have not learnt any lesson. Five members in a 26-member House cannot originate an impeachment process. They are not even up to one-third. As I have always maintained, I shudder to call these politicians democratic actors because they are really not acting democratically.” Ogunye pointed out that politicians were the ones attempting to destroy the nation’s democracy by their conduct and actions, which according to him, makes people to ask themselves if they made the right choice or if the “rogue politicians with rascality and irresponsible behaviour” can entrench democracy. He added, “The more these people misbehave, the more they derive validation for that kind of notion that this civil rule we are practising, which is going to be 20 years in 2019, is a highway to nowhere and that it’s a mission impossible. “We are talking about Akwa Ibom, what of the one in Edo, Ondo and Anambra states’ Houses of Assembly? What of the National Assembly? So, it’s all over and it’s very troubling.” He therefore called on the Federal Government to take keen interest in what was happening in the state, adding that even though federalism was in place, the Federal Government, which controls the police could not fold its arms, given the allegations that the leaders of the high command of the force were partisan and were supporting the minority to traduce the majority. “The Federal Government should investigate and ensure that justice is done, just as in the case of what happened in Ondo State where media persons were beaten up by thugs in the presence of policemen, who are federal agents paid by taxpayers money,” he added. The seasoned legal practitioner, however, cautioned that the more people lost faith in the democracy, the more the chance that opportunists could take advantage of it. He recalled that past usurpations in Nigeria had always been on the backdrop that the civilians were misbehaving. He said the country had been lucky to have 20 years of uninterrupted democracy and that if not that people were tired of the military and would not make any excuse for military incursion into politics, the civilians, especially politicians, had done enough to discredit democracy and to give it a bad name in order for it to be destroyed. He said, “Everywhere you go, you see impunity and it’s giving democracy a bad name in order to destroy it. It’s a devaluation of democratic ethos such that when the people see these things, they begin to wonder that this is not democracy and when those doubts begin to gain root, opportunists and subverters of civil rule may take advantage of that.” On the way forward, Ogunye advised, “I think people should take a step back and insist that they, not politicians, own this country and that they would not allow politicians to destroy civil governance or whatever resemblance of it that we have.”]]>

"Exciting news! TheNigeriaLawyer is now on WhatsApp Channels 🚀 Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest legal insights!" Click here! ....................................................................................................................... Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material and other digital content on this website, in whole or in part, without express and written permission from TheNigeriaLawyer, is strictly prohibited _________________________________________________________________ [Register Now] ILA Nigeria Branch Marks 10 Years With Infrastructure Financing As Theme For 7th Annual Conference The International Law Association - Nigeria Branch 7th annual conference on public-private partnerships for sustainable infrastructure financing, April 4-5 in Abuja. Details: https://ilanigeria.org.ng/conference _________________________________________________________________

NIALS' Compendia Series: Your One-Stop Solution For Navigating Nigerian Laws (2004-2023)

Email: info@nials.edu.ng, tugomak@yahoo.co.uk, Contact: For Inquiry and information, kindly contact, NIALS Director of Marketing: +2348074128732, +2348100363602.