Nnamdi Kanu

ADULBERT LEGAL SERVICES, Solicitors to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has petitioned the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, SAN on the declaration of IPOB as a terrorist Organization by the Nigerian Armed Forces.

The petition which was dated the 16th day of September, 2017 being a Saturday and signed by Aloy Ejimakor as Lead Counsel contained certain prayers which includes prompt measures by the Attorney General to issue an Advisory Opinion invalidating the said Declaration. According to the wordings of the petition, the Solicitors are writing on the instructions of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu being their Client, who is the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to petition the office of the A.G with respect to the declaration stated above. In the wordings of the petition:

“Having fully studied the referenced ‘Declaration’ and the pertinent Laws of Federation of Nigeria, it is our considered position that the action of the Nigerian Armed forces is ultra vires, unconstitutional, illegal and negatory. Our position is predicated on the following Points and Authorities:

  1. Terrorism (Prevention) Act:

The entire body of Nigerian law on terrorism is codified and known as Terrorism (Prevention) Act, 2011 (as amended in 2013). The provisions that dealt specifically with the procedure for declaring an entity a terrorist and proscribed organization are found at Section 2 of the Act, which states that:

“(1). Where two or more persons associate for the purpose of or where an organization engages in— (a) Participating or collaborating in an act of terrorism;

(b) promoting, encouraging or exhorting others to commit an act of terrorism; or

(c) setting up or pursuing acts of terrorism, the judge in Chambers may on an application made by the Attorney General, National Security Adviser or Inspector General of Police on the approval of the President; declare any entity to be a proscribed organization and the notice should be published in official gazette.

(2) An order made under sub-section (1) of this section shall be published in the official gazette, in two National newspapers and at such other places as the judge in Chambers may determine”.

As is clear from above, the statutory provisions are unambiguous and explicit. Let it also be clear that the foregoing provisions constitute the sole and entire statutory path through which an entity, such as IPOB, can legally be declared a terrorist or proscribed organization under the extant statute.

And to be sure, the procedure for making such ‘Declaration’ strictly and exclusively requires judicial intervention, not the martial orders of the Nigerian Armed Forces that also does not possess such powers under the Armed Forces Act. Consequently, it is our position that this ‘Declaration’ cannot stand in law.”

The petition also highlighted a sub-head which deals with previous judicial pronouncement on the group. According to the petition:

“On March 1, 2017 a Federal High Court in Abuja, per Justice Binta Nyako, struck out the charges of “terrorism, management of unlawful organization and intention to manufacture Improvised Explosive Devices planned to be used against Nigerian security agents”, which were instituted by your office against our Client in his extant capacity as the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra.

The judge ruled that ‘the proof of evidence failed to show that IPOB was indeed an unlawful organization’; and that ‘the prosecution failed to show that IPOB is a proscribed organization or that it was not registered either in Nigeria or United Kingdom’.

To be sure, and as regards ‘terrorism’ which is at issue here, the court had struck out the charge that our Client or any of the co-accused (all members of IPOB) committed – as framed by your office – “terrorism contrary to Section 2(1)(a) of Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2011 as amended in 2013.

A plain reading of the foregoing ruling will show that not only did the court find that IPOB is not a terrorist/proscribed organization, it also disposed of any allegation that our Client or any of the alleged ‘confederates’ committed acts amounting to terrorism. It is noteworthy, therefore, that the acts alleged as grounds for making the said ‘Declaration’ are virtually the same with, or similar to the acts previously held by the court as NOT constituting terrorism, as defined in Section 1 of the Terrorism (Prevention) Act.”s”

It is on the basis of the points and authorities cited that the A.G is urged to take prompt measures to issue an Advisory Opinion invalidating the said Declaration and to cause publication of same in the official Gazette of the Government of the Federation and in at least 2 Nigerian newspapers of national circulation.

The petition which was to be served personally and published has on notice: The Presidency, Chief of Defence Staff, Chief of Army Staff, Chief of Air Staff, Directorate of State Services, Inspector-General of Police, Governors of the 5 States of South East, National Assembly, International Community and also interestingly the Citizens of Nigeria.

Subscribe to Thenigerialawyer News!