EBF Endorsement Of Candidate For NBA President By Obinna Akpuchukwu

The leadership of EBF should wake up and smell the coffee. It must admit the fact that it has derailed and lost confidence of people. 1. EBF cannot be “endorsing candidates” for various offices in NBA when the Electoral Committee has not been set up and campaign has also not officially started. 2. A ‘candidate endorsed’ by EBF may be disqualified after the so-called endorsement. Since NBA has not set up Electoral Committee and no aspirant has either picked nomination form and or been cleared to contest for any office in the next NBA election, why the mad rush to ‘endorse a candidate’. Can a person who has not been cleared to contest in an election be called a candidate?. What if the ‘Endorsed candidate’ is disqualified by the NBA Electoral Committee, after EBF has endorsed him/her 3. EBF presently suffers from a crisis of confidence. Out of the four aspirants from the Eastern Bar (Mr Paul Usoro (SAN), Chief Arthur Obi-Okafor (SAN), Prof. Ernest Ojukwu (SAN), and Mazi Afam Osigwe) who are known to be warming up to contest for NBA Presidency, only one has confidence in the EBF to screen him. This should worry EBF. Where only one out of four believes in the ability of EBF to screen aspirants for endorsement, does it not show that the leadership and the Forum have a bigger problem to worry about?> DOES IT NOT WORRY IT THAT, ITS DECISIONS AND ACTIONS ARE SUSPECT?. 4. The essence of endorsement of an aspirant for NBA Presidency will be futile as the four aspirants will still contest in the election. 5. EBF does not have the power to compel people to vote for its ‘endorsed candidates’ as the introduction of universal suffrage and electronic voting has whittled the influence it had under the Delegates system of electing NBA national officers. 6. The idea of limiting the choice of lawyers in the election by presenting them with its sole candidate will rob the electoral process of the benefits from the democratic process of electing a President after listening to the programs of the candidates. 7. All is not well in EBF house as many question its legal and moral authority to pretend to wade into a matter when it is obvious it can neither stand some aspirants or even respect their right to contest in the election. For example, without giving Paul Usoro SAN a hearing, the leadership of EBF publicly declared he cannot contest in the election. 8. By rushing to adopt a ‘candidate’ EBF shows its failing ability to be a unifying factor and provide a level-playing field does not worry it. 9. As noted by Aguda Emeobong “Adoption of candidates by the EBF is oblivious of the present Bar electoral landscape. It may have worked in the past when the East was contesting against other zones for the same office and voting was delegates-based. Today, there is universal suffrage in the Bar. Adoption of one candidate can be counter-productive if a candidate not adopted by the EBF is eventually voted in by the wider Bar electorates. EBF should go and put its house in order and also ensure it does not fritter its goodwill. It will serve no useful purpose embarking on a process that will have the potential of reducing its standing. ]]>